NLRB Rules Against Amazon’s Request To Delay Alabama Union Vote Hearing

Amazon has lost the first round in the union organizing battle being waged at its warehouse in the Birmingham, AL region.

The Washington Post reports:

“The National Labor Relations Board on Wednesday rejected Amazon’s bid to delay a hearing on the union drive of Alabama workers into January, as the e-commerce giant signals its willingness to vigorously battle employees trying to organize.

 

Bessemer warehouse workers notified the NLRB last week that they want to hold an election to create a bargaining unit that would cover 1,500 full-time and part-time workers, represented by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU). The agency had scheduled a Dec. 11 hearing to determine, among other items, whether to call a union election.

 

But Amazon failed to persuade the agency to delay the hearing by at least a month. The union opposed rescheduling the hearing at all. The NLRB decided to push the hearing back a week to Dec. 18 without offering an explanation.

 

As part of its battle against workers trying to organize, the company retained Morgan Lewis & Bockius, ‘premier anti-union lawyers,’ according to Rebecca Givan, a labor studies professor at Rutgers University. Amazon used Morgan Lewis when it successfully fought off a union representation bid by small group of equipment maintenance and repair technicians at its Middletown, Del., warehouse in 2014.

 

Rather than vigorously battling unionization, Amazon retained Morgan Lewis ‘to help support the procedural components of this process,’ spokeswoman Heather Knox said via email. She didn’t comment on the NLRB’s scheduling ruling. RWDSU spokeswoman Chelsea Connor declined to comment.

 

The hiring of Morgan Lewis is one piece of Amazon’s efforts to thwart the organizing drive in a major labor battle against a company that has long opposed the unionization of its workforce. It’s also turning to the playbook companies often use to fight union drives, Givan said. One tactic: Push to include more workers in the proposed bargaining unit to make it harder for the union to reach those workers.

 

To file its NLRB notice, the RWDSU needed to have cards authorizing it to represent workers in collective bargaining signed by at least 30 percent of the proposed negotiating unit, which it claims is 1,500 workers. Amazon, though, argued in its filing that the proposed unit totals 5,723, though it didn’t explain how it came to that figure.

 

When Amazon opened the Bessemer warehouse in March, the company told local media it would employ 1,500 workers, a figure the city echoed on its website. The union questioned Amazon’s math, noting that the warehouse couldn’t possibly fit as many workers as the company argued should be in the proposed unit.

 

It ‘defies logic that a facility built to accommodate around 1,500 full time associates can accommodate 5,723 employees,’ the union argued in its filing.”

For the rest of the story, visit The Washington Post here.

You may also like:

Join our mailing list for the latest union news!

Leave a Reply